Need to find out the current ratings for popular network and cable tv shows?
The best one is Nielsen weekly ratings from Zap2It. It also includes the top cable shows.
Wednesday, August 30, 2017
Wednesday, August 23, 2017
Subsidiaries and Brands
Sometimes the name of your company will not show up in a database
search. One possible reason for this is that your company is a
subsidiary of a larger one. Or, you may want to know what the
subsidiaries are of a particular company.
This post will show you how to find owners of brands, the parent of a subsidiary or all subsidiaries of a larger company.
Here follow several options:
Type the corporate name (i.e. JC Penney ) into Mint and it's right there slightly off center to the right.
Bear in mind that subsidiaries are not the same thing as brands. If you need to know which brand goes with what company, consult Companies and Their Brands or Brands and Their Companies.
Finally, if you wanna do it the official way (below courtesy of the SEC website):
A list of subsidiaries must be disclosed to the SEC as Exhibit 21 to registration statements filed on Forms S-1, S-4, S-11, F-1, F-4, 10, and the annual report filed on Form 10-K.
This post will show you how to find owners of brands, the parent of a subsidiary or all subsidiaries of a larger company.
Here follow several options:
Type the corporate name (i.e. JC Penney ) into Mint and it's right there slightly off center to the right.
Bear in mind that subsidiaries are not the same thing as brands. If you need to know which brand goes with what company, consult Companies and Their Brands or Brands and Their Companies.
Finally, if you wanna do it the official way (below courtesy of the SEC website):
A list of subsidiaries must be disclosed to the SEC as Exhibit 21 to registration statements filed on Forms S-1, S-4, S-11, F-1, F-4, 10, and the annual report filed on Form 10-K.
Book Review: Debt: The First 5,000 Years
What is money? Does it represent
debt or stored value? And your answer to these questions carries a lot of
implications.
In Debt, the First 5,000 Years, David Graeber follows in a long line of people that argue that money is debt/obligation, all economies are centrally planned in fact and so let's make the economy work for us.
One reviewer's take follows:
"In advancing his thesis, Graeber introduces a number of anthropological and philosophical themes alongside a historical narrative of change. While the early chapters of the book engage with such subject areas as ‘Primordial debts’, ‘A brief treatise on the moralgrounds of economic relations’, and ‘Games with sex and death’, the latter half of the book is given over to a discussion of the changing role and nature of money and debt from the Axial Age (800 BCE to 600 CE) to the present day.
Three themes emerge as noteworthy for the economic historian: the myth of barter; the link between the introduction of coin as money and military activity; and long-run swings in the use of bullion versus credit money.
In Debt, the First 5,000 Years, David Graeber follows in a long line of people that argue that money is debt/obligation, all economies are centrally planned in fact and so let's make the economy work for us.
One reviewer's take follows:
"In advancing his thesis, Graeber introduces a number of anthropological and philosophical themes alongside a historical narrative of change. While the early chapters of the book engage with such subject areas as ‘Primordial debts’, ‘A brief treatise on the moralgrounds of economic relations’, and ‘Games with sex and death’, the latter half of the book is given over to a discussion of the changing role and nature of money and debt from the Axial Age (800 BCE to 600 CE) to the present day.
Three themes emerge as noteworthy for the economic historian: the myth of barter; the link between the introduction of coin as money and military activity; and long-run swings in the use of bullion versus credit money.
His conclusion is that the gradual
extension of commercial or market exchange, primarily as a result of military
imperialism, succeeded in reducing all moral obligations to a financial value,
and in the process destroyed the ‘baseline communism’ that Graeber believes to
have been the foundation of all social relations."
And this boils down to:
"Only when we realize that paying one’s debts ‘is not the essence of morality’, but merely our current human arrangement, can we agree to change that arrangement for the benefit of us all."
Well, that's one take on the nature of money, and one you'll see asserted from time to time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)